Advances in Industrial Engineering

Advances in Industrial Engineering

Evaluating Building Information Modelling through a Multi-Dimensional Stakeholder Analysis

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Construction Project Management, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, ST.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor, School of Industrial Engineering, College of engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Building Information Modelling (BIM) has emerged as a key enabler of digital transformation in the Architecture, Engineering, Construction, and Operation (AECO) industry. However, the transition toward higher levels of BIM maturity, particularly Level 3, remains a significant challenge due to the complexity of integrating technological, organizational, and regulatory dimensions. The study proposes an integrated framework for evaluating BIM Level 3 implementation based on three core dimensions—technology, process, and policy—and examines its impact on key stakeholders from a Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) perspective. The research adopts a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative analysis and quantitative evaluation through structured questionnaires. A case study was conducted within the Tehran Construction Engineering Organization to validate the proposed framework. The results indicate that while technological readiness is relatively advanced, significant gaps persist in process integration and policy support. Furthermore, the findings highlight the critical role of stakeholder coordination and information flow in achieving effective BIM implementation. The proposed framework provides a practical decision-support tool for project managers and policymakers, enabling a more holistic understanding of BIM maturity and its implications.
Keywords
Subjects

1.    Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2011). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modelling. Wiley. ISBN: 9780470541371
2.    Azhar, S. (2011). Building information modelling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 11(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127
3.    Succar, B. (2009). Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Automation in Construction, 18(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003
4.    Saka, A. B., & Chan, D. W. (2022). Adoption of BIM in construction: A systematic review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(3), 987–1012. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2022-0188
5.    Hardin, B., & McCool, D. (2015). BIM and Construction Management. ISBN: 9781118942765
6.    Gu, N., & London, K. (2010). Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Automation in Construction, 19(8), 988–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.002
7.    Khosrowshahi, F., & Arayici, Y. (2012). Roadmap for implementation of BIM in the UK construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(6), 610–635. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981211277531
8.    Li, X., et al. (2020). Mapping the knowledge domains of BIM: A bibliometric approach. Automation in Construction, 84, 195–206. https://doi.org/1sa0.1016/j.autcon.2017.09.011
9.    Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., & Volm, J. M. (2013). The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM). International Journal of Project Management, 31(7), 971–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001
10.              Abanda, F. H., & Byers, L. (2021). An investigation of the impact of BIM on project performance. Journal of Building Engineering, 34, 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101435
11.              Project Management Institute (PMI). (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (7th Ed.). ISBN: 9781628256642
12.              Volk, R., Stengel, J., & Schultmann, F. (2014). Building information modelling (BIM) for existing buildings—Literature review and future needs. Automation in Construction, 38, 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.023
13.              Love, P. E. D., et al. (2014). A benefits realization management building information modelling framework for asset owners. Automation in Construction, 37, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.007
14.              Chen, Z., et al. (2023). Optimized decision support for BIM maturity assessment. Automation in Construction, 149, 104808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104808
15.              Chowdhury, M., et al. (2024). Comprehensive analysis of BIM adoption: From narrow focus to holistic understanding. Automation in Construction, 160, 105301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105301
16.              Alshibani, A., et al. (2024). Investigation of the driving power of the barriers affecting BIM adoption in construction management through ISM. Results in Engineering, 24, 102987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102987
17.              Abideen, A. Z., et al. (2025). Development and evaluation of a maturity assessment tool for integrating building information modelling into operations and maintenance phase of buildings. Developments in the Built Environment, 21, 100619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100619