Customization of the Renault-Nissan Production System by Using a Combination of NGT, DANP and VIKOR (Case study: An Iranian Automaker)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

A necessary condition for achieving organizational success is using a new customized production system and fitting the new customized production system tools with old processes of the organization. This paper provides a model for customizing Renault production system (SPR) to an Iranian automaker company. After defining the framework of customization alternatives by using Nominal Group Technique, the key criteria which are necessary to evaluate and prioritize alternatives, have been established. The relationship map of alternatives and criteria were established by using DEMATEL techniques and MATLAB. Finally, weights of the criteria and alternatives were calculated by using ANP method. Results show that the alternatives representing minimal changes in SPR and mild changes in the organization’s current processes are selected.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Cochran, W. J. et al. (2001). “Rationalizing the Design of the Toyota Production System: a Comparison of Two Approaches”, Proceedings of International CIRP Design Seminar Design in the New Economy, Stockholm, Sweden.
  2. Parthasarathy, S., and Sharma S. (2014). “Determining ERP Customization Choices Using Nominal Group Technique and Analytical Hierarchy Process”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 65, No. 6, PP. 1009-1017.
  3. Womack, J., Jones, D. T., and Roos, D. (1990). “The Machine That Changed the World: the Story of Lean Production”, Harper Perennial, New York, NY.
  4. Wei, Ch., Chien ,Ch., and Wang M. J. (2005). “An AHP-Based Approach to ERP System Selection”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 96, No. 1, PP. 47–62.
  5. Karsak, E. E., (2002), “Distance-Based Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Evaluating Flexible Manufacturing System Alternatives”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 40, No. 13, PP. 3167-3181.
  6. Shukla, O. J., Soni, G., and Anand, G. (2014). “An Application of Grey Based Decision Making Approach for the Selection of Manufacturing System”, Grey Systems: Theory and Application, Vol. 4 No. 3, PP.447-462.
  7. Almannai, B., Greenough, R. M., and Kay, J. M. (2008). “A Decision Support Tool Based on QFD and FMEA for the Selection of Manufacturing Automation Technologies”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Published Online, Vol. 24, No. 4, PP. 501-507
  8. Anand, G., and Kodali, R. (2008). “Selection of Lean Manufacturing Systems Using PROMETHEE”, Journal of Modelling in Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, PP. 40-70.
  9. Herron, C., and Hicks, C. (2008). “The Transfer of Selected Lean Manufacturing Techniques from Japanese Automotive Manufacturing Into General Manufacturing (UK) Through Change Agents”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 24, No. 4, PP. 524-531.
  10. Bozdag, C. E., Kahraman, C., and Ruan, D. (2003). “Fuzzy Group Decision Making for Selection Among Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems”, Computers in Industry, Vol. 51, No. 1, PP. 13-29.
  11. Kodali, R., and Sangwan, K. S. (2004). “Multi-Attribute Decision Models for Justification of Cellular Manufacturing Systems”, International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Publisher, Vol. 6, No. 3 and 4, PP. 298-320.
  12. Jayaram, J., Das A., and Nicolae, M. (2010). “Looking Beyond the Obvious: Unraveling the Toyota Production System”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 128, PP. 280–291.
  13. Bergenwall, A. L., Chen, Ch., and White, R. E. (2012). “TPS’s Process Design in American Automotive Plants and Its Effects on the Triple Bottom Line and Sustainability”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 140, No. 1, PP. 374–384.
  14. Cua, K. O., Mckone, K. E., and Schroeder, R. G. (2001). “Relationships Between Implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and Manufacturing Performance”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 19, No. 6, PP. 675–694.
  15. Masuman, M. A., and Delaram, R. (2011). “Total Preventive Maintanace in Renulet Production System”, 6th National Conference on Maintanace, Tehran.
  16. Shafia, M. A., Abdollahzadeh, S., and Pashaabgarmi, H. (2014), “Using the Process of Hierarchical Analysis and Analytic Kano for Ranking Tools of National Standardization System”, Journal of Industrial Engineering Research in Production Systems, Vol. 1 No. 1, PP. 78-83.
  17. Gornet, M. (2004), “SPR Management Book”, Renault, France.
  18. Matsumoto, F., Kimura Sh., and Mosos J.V. (2015). “Renault-Nissan Alliance Production Way”, Renault-Nissan, France.
  19. Tzeng, G. H., and Huang, J. J., (2011). “Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications”. CRC Press.
Advances in Industrial Engineering
Volume 52, Issue 2
July 2018
Pages 207-222

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics