Sustainable Project Portfolio Selection Considering Combined Rankings Under Uncertainty: A Case Study

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Yazd University, Iran

2 Department of industrial engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

Due to resource limitations such as time, money, and human forces, project-oriented organizations always decide to choose among their candidate projects. In sustainable decision-making, in addition to responding to the internal needs of the organization, responding to social needs and protecting the environment are also taken into consideration. More specifically, in sustainable project selection, projects are selected with a wider view including economic, social, and environmental pillars. In this article, a combined approach has been presented to select investment projects sustainably, determining the ranking of projects based on the combined output of several multi-attribute decision-making methods. Since the data needed in decision-making is often associated with uncertainty, the problem of project selection has been modeled and analyzed in a non-deterministic way using a robust optimization approach. In the studied case, six projects were selected by the deterministic model, while the robust model reduced them to three projects due to the pessimistic modeling approach. It was also observed that by taking into account the uncertainty, the optimal values of three objective functions have been reduced by 28%, 46%, and 28% respectively; but the validity of the answers is guaranteed in non-deterministic real-world situations, which is very important in the investment problems. The main benefits of the proposed approach are: 1) integrating evaluation and selection phases in order to make wise and optimal decisions, 2) combining the results of different MCDM methods which helps the managers with selecting the projects that are generally acceptable by MCDM methods, 3) because a robust optimization model is implemented, the model solutions remain more feasible in resource fluctuations, and 4) the model prevents ignoring high-priority projects which can be outranked by permutations of lower-priority projects.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • Carazo, A.F.; Multi-criteria project portfolio selection. In handbook on project management and scheduling 2015, 2, 709-728.
  • Silvius, A.J.; Schipper, R. P. Sustainability in project management: A literature review and impact analysis. Social Business 2014, 4(1), 63-96.
  • Gimenez, C.; Sierra, V.; Rodon, J. Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. INT J PROD ECON 2012, 140(1), 149-159.
  • Feizpour, M; Makkian, N. Dissection of unemployment in Yazd province: fears and hopes. Economic magazine 2017, 77, 84-65 .
  • Salehi, M.; Mousavi, M.; Bagheri Kashkoli, A. Evaluation and ranking of environmental issues based on sustainable development indicators (case study: cities of Yazd province). The first conference on architecture and sustainable urban spaces, Mashhad 2013.
  • Center for social health thinking at Yazd university: https://yazd.ac.ir/4006-5-2671 (accessed on 20 November 2022)
  • Meteorology of Yazd Province:http://www.yazdmet.ir/SC.php?type=component_sections&id=112&sid=5714 (accessed on 20 November 2022)
  • Ebrahimzadeh Asmin, H.; Abbasian, M.; Brahui, A. The relationship between urbanization growth, selected economic indicators and Co2 emissions in Iran. Water Eng 2019, 6(4), 402-414.
  • Frini, A.; BenAmor, S. A TOPSIS multi-criteria multi-period approach for selecting projects in sustainable development context. International conference on industrial engineering and operations management (IEOM) 2015, 1-9.
  • Kudratova, S.; Huang, X.; Kudratov, K.; Qudratov, S. Corporate sustainability and stakeholder value trade‐offs in project selection through optimization modeling: Application of investment banking. CORP SOC RESP ENV MA 2020, 27(2), 815-824.
  • Khalili-Damghani, K.; Sadi-Nezhad, S. A decision support system for fuzzy multi-objective multi-period sustainable project selection. COMPUT IND ENG 2013, 64(4), 1045-1060.
  • Khalili-Damghani, K.; Sadi-Nezhad, S. A hybrid fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making approach for sustainable project Applied SOFT COMPUT 2013, 13(1), 339-352.
  • Mavrotas, G.; Figueira, J. R.; Siskos, E. Robustness analysis methodology for multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems and application to project selection. Omega 2016, 52, 142-155.
  • Jalili Bal. Z.; Bozorgi Amiri. A.; Haji Yakhchali. S. Presenting a combination of linear mathematical programming model and multi-criteria decision-making models in order to select a portfolio of projects. 1st national conference on quantitative models & techniques in management, Tehran 2016 (in Persian).
  • Jalili Bal. Z.; Bozorgi Amiri. A.; Haji Yakhchali. S. Presentation of a combined Lexicographic and VICOR approach in order to prioritize projects considering sustainable development criteria. The fourth national conference in management, accounting, and economics with an emphasis on regional and global marketing 2018 (in Persian).
  • Ferreira, L.; Borenstein, D.; Santi, E. Hybrid fuzzy MADM ranking procedure for better alternative discrimination. ENG APPL ARTIF INTEL 2016, 50, 71-82.
  • Lee, H.C.; Chang, C.T. Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan. ADV MATER RES-SWITZ 2018, 92, 883-896.
  • Yazdani, K.M.; Hasanpour, H. Presenting a model for prioritizing and selecting portfolio projects in a private joint-stock company based on the network analysis process (AHP). Rushd technology magazine 2016, 14(53), 45-58 (in Persian).
  • Naderi, A.; Qodsipour, H. Using a multi-indicator decision-making method in determining the optimal portfolio of an organization's projects. International conference on interdisciplinary studies in management and engineering, Tehran 2018 (in Persian).
  • Naderi, A.; Malekpour, M.; Qodsipour, H. The application of multi-criteria decision-making in determining the optimal portfolio of projects of an organization (case study of Dena Industrial Group). The 15th international project management conference of Iran, Tehran 2019 (in Persian).
  • Behravesh, P.; Safarkhanlou, M.; Qodsipour, H. Project portfolio prioritization in project-oriented companies by developing a combined AHP and TOPSIS approach, case study: Fanap Plus Company. International conference on interdisciplinary studies in management and engineering, Tehran 2018 (in Persian).
  • Babazadeh, H.; Ajrian, S. Presenting the optimal project portfolio selection model under conditions of uncertainty and mutual effects between projects. The 10th international conference of the Iranian operations research association, Babolsar 2016 (in Persian).
  • Ebnerasoul, M.; Ghannadpour, S. F.; Haeri, A. A collective efficacy-based approach for bi-objective sustainable project portfolio selection using interdependency network model between projects. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2022, 1-21.
  • Jurík, L., Horňáková, N., Šantavá, E., Cagáňová, D., Sablik, J. Application of AHP method for project selection in the context of sustainable development. Wireless networks 2022, 1-10.
  • Mohagheghi, V., Mousavi, S. M., Shahabi-Shahmiri, R. Sustainable project portfolio selection and optimization with considerations of outsourcing decisions, financing options and staff assignment under interval type-2 fuzzy uncertainty. Neural Computing and Applications 2022, 34(17), 14577-14598.
  • Swarnakar, V., Singh, A. R., Antony, J., Tiwari, A. K., Garza-Reyes, J. A. Sustainable Lean Six Sigma project selection in manufacturing environments using best-worst method. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 2023, 34(7-8), 990-1014.
  • Borda, J. D. (1784). Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin. Histoire de l'Academie Royale des Sciences pour 1784, 1781.
  • Copeland, A.H. A reasonable social welfare function. Seminar on applications of mathematics to social sciences, University of Michigan 1951.
  • Kemeny, J.G. Mathematics without numbers. Daedalus 1959, 88(4), 577-591.
  • Dodgson, C.A method of taking votes on more than two issues. The theory of committees and elections 1876.
  • Köhler, G. Choix multicritère et analyse algébrique de données ordinals. Doctoral dissertation, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble-INPG, Université Joseph-Fourier-Grenoble I 1978.
  • Arrow, K.J.; Raynaud, H. Social choice and multicriterion decision-making. MIT Press Books 1986, 1.
  • Mavrotas, G.; Diakoulaki, D.; Kourentzis, A. Selection among ranked projects under segmentation, policy and logical constraints. OPER RES-GER 2008, 187(1), 177-192.
  • Bertsimas, D.; Sim, M. The price of robustness. OPER RES 2004, 52(1), 35-53.
  • Mulvey, J.M.; Vanderbei, R.J.; Zenios, S.A. Robust optimization of large-scale systems. OPER RES-GER 1995, 43(2), 264-281.
Advances in Industrial Engineering
Volume 57, Issue 2
December 2023
Pages 187-201

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics